Comments on: Views from the Top http://www.okgeorgewashington.org/2009/08/30/views-from-the-top/ Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:36:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Bruce http://www.okgeorgewashington.org/2009/08/30/views-from-the-top/comment-page-1/#comment-758 Bruce Wed, 19 May 2010 15:04:04 +0000 http://www.okgeorgewashington.org/?p=747#comment-758 The glass in the photo looks like it might be slightly distorted. Do you know if some of it is original? r The glass in the photo looks like it might be slightly distorted. Do you know if some of it is original?
r

]]> By: Reagan http://www.okgeorgewashington.org/2009/08/30/views-from-the-top/comment-page-1/#comment-301 Reagan Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:57:27 +0000 http://www.okgeorgewashington.org/?p=747#comment-301 I am still in complete awe of that cupola. I will not soon forget that experience. I am still in complete awe of that cupola. I will not soon forget that experience.

]]> By: jmcclaren http://www.okgeorgewashington.org/2009/08/30/views-from-the-top/comment-page-1/#comment-298 jmcclaren Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:46:07 +0000 http://www.okgeorgewashington.org/?p=747#comment-298 I thought the same thing, but Mount Vernon's Assistant Curator explained to me that they have special glass in the windows to help maintain the integrity of the interior (so unless they were able to add something to the original panes they would not be the original). Thanks for asking! Jan I thought the same thing, but Mount Vernon's Assistant Curator explained to me that they have special glass in the windows to help maintain the integrity of the interior (so unless they were able to add something to the original panes they would not be the original). Thanks for asking! Jan

]]> By: Rosalynn http://www.okgeorgewashington.org/2009/08/30/views-from-the-top/comment-page-1/#comment-296 Rosalynn Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:22:32 +0000 http://www.okgeorgewashington.org/?p=747#comment-296 The glass in the photo looks like it might be slightly distorted. Do you know if some of it is original? r The glass in the photo looks like it might be slightly distorted. Do you know if some of it is original?
r

]]>